We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
AstroNova's Q2 Loss Widens Y/Y Amid Product ID Challenges
Read MoreHide Full Article
Shares of AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT - Free Report) have declined 12.9% since the company reported its earnings for the quarter ended July 31, 2025. This compares to the S&P 500 index’s 1.5% growth over the same time frame. Over the past month, the stock has declined 10.5% compared with the S&P 500’s 2.9% growth. The stock’s relative underperformance highlights investors’ cautious stance following the company’s latest results.
AstroNova incurred a second-quarter fiscal 2026 net loss of 16 cents per share, wider than a loss of 4 cents per share in the prior-year period. On a non-GAAP basis, the firm posted a net loss of 4 cents per share against a net income of 8 cents per share a year ago.
Revenues fell 10.9% year over year to $36.1 million from $40.5 million.
Gross profit dropped 18.8% to $11.6 million, as gross margin compressed to 32.2% from 35.3%. The company swung to a net loss of $1.2 million, wider than a loss of $0.3 million in the prior-year period. On a non-GAAP basis, the firm posted a net loss of $0.4 million against a net income of $0.6 million a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA declined 46.6% to $2.1 million, underscoring weaker profitability.
The company’s Product Identification (Product ID) segment generated $24.8 million in revenue, down 8.9% year over year. This reflected delays in rolling out new technology, longer sales cycles tied to capital investment decisions for higher-value printers, and weaker sales of legacy QuickLabel and TrojanLabel products. Product ID operating income fell to $1.9 million from $2.3 million, with the operating margin slipping to 7.7% from 8.6%.
The Aerospace segment posted revenues of $11.3 million, a 15.1% decline compared with last year’s $13.4 million. The drop stemmed from elevated prior-year sales driven by large, atypical orders. Aerospace operating profit slid 37.1% to $2.4 million, with margins narrowing to 21.2% from 28.7%.
Orders for the quarter were steady at $35.9 million compared with the year-ago period, with the backlog standing at $25.3 million at the quarter's end, down slightly from $25.5 million in the previous quarter. Product ID’s book-to-bill ratio came in at 95%, while Aerospace maintained a healthier 110%.
Management Commentary
President and CEO Jorik Ittmann described the quarter’s results as “disappointing,” acknowledging ongoing challenges in the Product ID segment. He emphasized the need to rebuild customer relationships, secure new clients, and improve execution. The CEO, appointed earlier in the year, stated he is prioritizing organizational change with a focus on urgency and accountability.
CFO Thomas DeByle noted that while the first half of the year was pressured by weak sales and restructuring charges, the company expects modest revenue growth in the second half. He pointed to improving product mix and the benefits of cost-cutting efforts as potential drivers of margin recovery.
Factors Influencing Headline Numbers
AstroNova’s headline revenue decline was primarily due to Product ID shipment delays and a challenging comparison against last year’s unusual Aerospace orders. Gross margin compression reflected lower volumes and an unfavorable product mix. While operating expenses were reduced by roughly $0.9 million, these savings were insufficient to offset the impact of weaker sales and gross profit. Interest expenses remained flat year over year at $0.9 million, weighing further on the bottom line.
Guidance
Management revised fiscal 2026 revenue guidance downward to $149-$154 million, from a prior range of $160-$165 million. At the midpoint, this outlook implies revenues to be roughly flat with fiscal 2025. Adjusted EBITDA margin expectations were also trimmed to 7.5-8.5%, from a previous 8.5-9.5% range. The company also highlighted an expected effective tax rate of about 32.8% for the year.
Other Developments
During the quarter, AstroNova shipped redesigned printers using MTEX’s autonomous ink printheads, including the QL-425 and QL-435 professional label presses, and began shipping its AJ-800 direct-to-packaging solution in August. In Aerospace, the company launched shipments of its ToughWriter 640 printer to a major aircraft manufacturer, advancing its transition away from legacy flight deck printers. Additionally, AstroNova amended its credit agreement after breaching a covenant and is negotiating a restructuring into a real estate–backed loan expected within 60 days.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
AstroNova's Q2 Loss Widens Y/Y Amid Product ID Challenges
Shares of AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT - Free Report) have declined 12.9% since the company reported its earnings for the quarter ended July 31, 2025. This compares to the S&P 500 index’s 1.5% growth over the same time frame. Over the past month, the stock has declined 10.5% compared with the S&P 500’s 2.9% growth. The stock’s relative underperformance highlights investors’ cautious stance following the company’s latest results.
AstroNova incurred a second-quarter fiscal 2026 net loss of 16 cents per share, wider than a loss of 4 cents per share in the prior-year period. On a non-GAAP basis, the firm posted a net loss of 4 cents per share against a net income of 8 cents per share a year ago.
Revenues fell 10.9% year over year to $36.1 million from $40.5 million.
Gross profit dropped 18.8% to $11.6 million, as gross margin compressed to 32.2% from 35.3%. The company swung to a net loss of $1.2 million, wider than a loss of $0.3 million in the prior-year period. On a non-GAAP basis, the firm posted a net loss of $0.4 million against a net income of $0.6 million a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA declined 46.6% to $2.1 million, underscoring weaker profitability.
AstroNova, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
AstroNova, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | AstroNova, Inc. Quote
Other Key Business Metrics
The company’s Product Identification (Product ID) segment generated $24.8 million in revenue, down 8.9% year over year. This reflected delays in rolling out new technology, longer sales cycles tied to capital investment decisions for higher-value printers, and weaker sales of legacy QuickLabel and TrojanLabel products. Product ID operating income fell to $1.9 million from $2.3 million, with the operating margin slipping to 7.7% from 8.6%.
The Aerospace segment posted revenues of $11.3 million, a 15.1% decline compared with last year’s $13.4 million. The drop stemmed from elevated prior-year sales driven by large, atypical orders. Aerospace operating profit slid 37.1% to $2.4 million, with margins narrowing to 21.2% from 28.7%.
Orders for the quarter were steady at $35.9 million compared with the year-ago period, with the backlog standing at $25.3 million at the quarter's end, down slightly from $25.5 million in the previous quarter. Product ID’s book-to-bill ratio came in at 95%, while Aerospace maintained a healthier 110%.
Management Commentary
President and CEO Jorik Ittmann described the quarter’s results as “disappointing,” acknowledging ongoing challenges in the Product ID segment. He emphasized the need to rebuild customer relationships, secure new clients, and improve execution. The CEO, appointed earlier in the year, stated he is prioritizing organizational change with a focus on urgency and accountability.
CFO Thomas DeByle noted that while the first half of the year was pressured by weak sales and restructuring charges, the company expects modest revenue growth in the second half. He pointed to improving product mix and the benefits of cost-cutting efforts as potential drivers of margin recovery.
Factors Influencing Headline Numbers
AstroNova’s headline revenue decline was primarily due to Product ID shipment delays and a challenging comparison against last year’s unusual Aerospace orders. Gross margin compression reflected lower volumes and an unfavorable product mix. While operating expenses were reduced by roughly $0.9 million, these savings were insufficient to offset the impact of weaker sales and gross profit. Interest expenses remained flat year over year at $0.9 million, weighing further on the bottom line.
Guidance
Management revised fiscal 2026 revenue guidance downward to $149-$154 million, from a prior range of $160-$165 million. At the midpoint, this outlook implies revenues to be roughly flat with fiscal 2025. Adjusted EBITDA margin expectations were also trimmed to 7.5-8.5%, from a previous 8.5-9.5% range. The company also highlighted an expected effective tax rate of about 32.8% for the year.
Other Developments
During the quarter, AstroNova shipped redesigned printers using MTEX’s autonomous ink printheads, including the QL-425 and QL-435 professional label presses, and began shipping its AJ-800 direct-to-packaging solution in August. In Aerospace, the company launched shipments of its ToughWriter 640 printer to a major aircraft manufacturer, advancing its transition away from legacy flight deck printers. Additionally, AstroNova amended its credit agreement after breaching a covenant and is negotiating a restructuring into a real estate–backed loan expected within 60 days.